For this assignment, in 500-600 words explain:
1) the case, Chevron v. DNRC and how the majority and dissenting opinions addressed the future of agency
deference.
2) Which argument do you find more persuasive, and why?
3) If the Chevron deference doctrine is overturned, how do you envision this impacting future administrative
agency rulemaking?
See uploaded files for links to the three sources