Part I: Analysis of Leadership within an Organization Analyze leadership at Amazon. As part of your assessment, define the leadership approaches, traits, styles, and tasks accomplished within the organization.A well-written paper 3-4 pages long, include a minimum of three outside resources, and be formatted according to APA Requirements.Part II: Personal Leadership Profile Imagine yourself assuming a leadership role within the organization you analyzed for Part I. Then create a profile of yourself to share with current leaders. Your profile should demonstrate how you could serve as an effective leader within the organization and include the following components:Your leadership styleYour values and personalityYour abilities in motivating, communicating, team-building, relationship-building, and innovationYour strategy styleYour followership styleYour leadership visionKeep in mind that this profile is not only to reflect you as an individual and as a leader, but it should also synthesize leadership knowledge acquired in this course.This part of the paper should be 5-6 pages in length and be formatted according to APA Requirements.Please see attached grading rubric.
org405_portfolioprojectrubric.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
ORG405: Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Requirements
Content
Analysis
Decision-Making
Meets Expectation
Approaches
Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
27-30 Points
The Portfolio
includes all of the
required
components,
including Parts I &
II in their entirety.
36-40 Points
Demonstrates
strong or adequate
knowledge of the
role of leadership
and its application
in the workplace.
21-24 Points
The Portfolio
includes most of
the required
components,
including Parts I &
II.
28-32 Points
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in demonstration
of knowledge of
the role of
leadership and its
application in the
workplace.
42-48 Points
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications of the
role of leadership
as applied in the
workplace.
42-48 Points
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in decision-making
regarding how to
apply the concepts
in this course to
workplace
situations.
15-18 Points
The Portfolio
includes some of
the required
components,
including Parts I &
II.
20-24 Points
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge of the
role of leadership
and its application
in the workplace.
7-12 Points
The Portfolio
includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
9-16 Points
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
role of leadership.
30-36 Points
Major errors or
omissions in
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications of the
role of leadership
as applied in the
workplace.
13-24 Points
Fails to demonstrate
thought, insight,
and analysis of the
role of leadership.
30-36 Points
Major errors or
omissions in
decision-making
regarding how to
apply the concepts
in this course to
workplace
situations.
13-24 Points
Fails to demonstrate
decision-making
regarding how to
apply the concepts
in this course to
workplace
situations.
54-60 Points
Provides strong or
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications of the
role of leadership
as applied in the
workplace.
54-60 Points
Demonstrates
strong or adequate
thought and
insight in decisionmaking regarding
how to apply the
concepts in this
course to
workplace
situations.
ORG405: Portfolio Project Rubric
Synthesis and
Evaluation
63-70 Points
Demonstrates
strong or adequate
synthesis and
evaluation of
course concepts in
regard to the
personal
leadership profile
or the scenario in
Option #2.
13-15 Points
Cites and
integrates at least
3 credible sources.
13-15 Points
Application of
Sources well or
Source Material
adequately chosen
to prsubstance and
perspectives as
applied to
leadership
concepts and skills.
Mechanics and Writing
18-20 Points
Organization
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper essay
format including
an introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
Conforms to
project
requirements.
Sources
49-56 Points
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in synthesis and
evaluation of
course concepts in
regard to the
personal
leadership profile
or the scenario in
Option #2.
10-12 Points
Cites and
integrates 2
credible sources.
10-12 Points
Some significant
but not major
problems with
selection and
linkage of sources
to the assignment
requirements.
35-42 Points
Major errors or
omissions in
synthesis and
evaluation of
course concepts in
regard to the
personal
leadership profile
or the scenario in
Option #2.
15-28 Points
Fails to demonstrate
synthesis and
evaluation of course
concepts in regard
to the personal
leadership profile or
the scenario in
Option #2.
7-9 Points
Cites and
integrates 1
credible source.
7-9 Points
Major problems
with selection and
linkage of sources
to the assignment
requirements.
4-6 Points
Cites and integrates
no credible sources.
14-16 Points
Small number of
significant but not
major flaws in
organization and
writing; is in
proper essay
format. In a minor
way does not
conform to project
requirements.
10-12 Points
Major problems in
organization and
writing; does not
completely follow
proper essay
format. In a
significant way
does not conform
to project
requirements.
5-8 Points
Project is not well
organized or well
written and is not in
proper essay
format. Does not
conform to project
requirements.
4-6 Points
Source selection is
seriously flawed; no
linkage to
knowledge from the
course.
ORG405: Portfolio Project Rubric
Grammar and
Style
Demonstrates
proper use of APA
style
18-20 Points
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure; few or
no minor errors in
grammar and
spelling;
appropriate writing
style; clear and
concise with no
unsupported
comments.
18-20 Points
Project contains
proper APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements, with
no more than one
significant error.
Total points possible = 350
14-16 Points
Small number of
significant but not
major errors in
grammar and
spelling; generally
appropriate
writing.
10-12 Points
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development;
work needed on
grammar and
spelling; does not
meet program
expectations.
5-8 Points
Poor quality;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar
and/or spelling;
inappropriate
writing style that
interferes with
clarity.
14-16 Points
Few errors in APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements, with
no more than two
to three significant
errors.
10-12 Points
Significant errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements, with
four to five
significant errors.
5-8 Points
Numerous errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with
more than five
significant errors.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Recent Comments