Now that you have researched your topic, as well as some of the stakeholders who are actively and publicly invested in that topic, you have become an engaged stakeholder yourself. In Project 3, you will persuade non-engaged stakeholders to care about the issue and engage with it by making a call to action. You will draw on research about your issue or topic and use your knowledge of rhetorical appeals to educate, engage and empower audiencesThe Intermediate Draft for Project 3 takes the form of a draft of the written (text only) argument. This draft should be an essay (1200-1400 words) that (a) educates an audience of non-engaged stakeholders about the issue or topic; (b) engages the audience by convincing them that they should care about this issue or topic; and (c) empowers the audience to take action in some way. This draft should include a thesis, all major points, evidence to support these points (including in-text citations from appropriate sources), and a Works Cited page, should be five sources. MLA StyleTerms you should know:Non-engaged stakeholder: A person (or group of people) who is uninvolved in or unconcerned with the discussion about an issue and who is not interested or invested in taking action on that issueThis written part of the assignment will be evaluated using the rubric that iattachmenti choose immigration rights in the United States topic to talk about in the essay.
enc1102.p3.composing_multi_modal_arguments.rubric.17.final.pdf
Unformatted Attachment Preview
ENC 1102 Project 3 | Composing Multi-modal Arguments Assessment Rubric
Criteria
Analysis
25%
Evidence
25%
Organization
20%
Format
15%
Style
15%
Emerging (0-2)
Developing (3-5)
Assignment requirements not met
Thesis absent thesis or minimally presents an
arguable claim
Little connection between thesis and claims
presented in essay
Little effort to educate the audience about topic
and problem
Call-to-action rhetoric minimally persuasive
Source research minimums not met
Arguable claims minimally supported by
appropriate and credible sources
Supporting details minimally relevant to
persuasive argument
Source material improperly integrated
Quotes, paraphrases, and summaries
improperly cited
Little distinction between writer’s voice and
source’s ideas
Opening minimally presents background
information on topic and problem
Topic sentences absent or minimally relevant to
thesis and paragraph content
Transitions absent or infrequently used
Supporting points flow illogically
Conclusion absent or irrelevant to thesis and
arguable claims
Document design for header, heading, line
spacing, margins, and font style minimally
compliant with MLA style conventions
Little attention to MLA formatting of source
citations, including hanging indent, punctuation,
capitalization, and italics use
Source citations display incomplete source
information
Significant problems with sentence
construction, diction, and word choice
Frequent grammar and punctuation errors
Frequent proofreading errors
Inconsistent point of view
Language significantly interferes with
communication of ideas
Assignment requirements partially met
Thesis partially presents an arguable claim
Partial connection between thesis and claims
presented in essay
Inconsistent effort to educate the audience about
topic and problem
Call-to-action rhetoric somewhat persuasive
Assignment requirements adequately met
Thesis presents an arguable claim
Adequate connection between thesis and claims
presented in essay
Consistent effort to educate the audience about
topic and problem
Call-to-action rhetoric adequately persuasive
Mastering (6-8)
Source research minimums partially met
Arguable claims partially supported by
appropriate and credible sources
Supporting details somewhat relevant to
persuasive argument
Source material inconsistently integrated
Quotes, paraphrases, and summaries
inconsistently cited
Some distinction between writer’s voice and
source’s ideas
Opening partially presents background
information on topic and problem
Topic sentences inconsistently relevant to thesis
and paragraph content
Transitions inconsistently used
Supporting points flow somewhat logically
Conclusion somewhat relevant to thesis and
arguable claims
Document design for header, heading, line
spacing, margins, and font style partially compliant
with MLA style conventions
Inconsistent attention to MLA formatting of
source citations, including hanging indent,
punctuation, capitalization, and italics use
Source citations display partially complete source
information
Some problems with sentence construction,
diction, and word choice
Some grammar and punctuation errors
Some proofreading errors
Somewhat consistent point of view
Language occasionally interferes with
communication of ideas
Source research minimums adequately met
Arguable claims supported by appropriate and
credible sources
Supporting details relevant to persuasive
argument
Source material consistently integrated
Quotes, paraphrases, and summaries properly
cited
Adequate distinction between writer’s voice and
source’s ideas
Opening adequately presents background
information on topic and problem
Topic sentences consistently relevant to thesis
and paragraph content
Transitions consistently used
Supporting points flow logically
Conclusion relevant to thesis and arguable claims
Document design for header, heading, line
spacing, margins, and font style compliant with
MLA style conventions
Consistent attention to MLA formatting of source
citations, including hanging indent, punctuation,
capitalization, and italics use
Source citations display complete source
information
Few or no problems with sentence construction,
diction, and word choice
Few or no grammar and punctuation errors
Few or no proofreading errors
Consistent point of view
Language facilitates communication of ideas
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Recent Comments