please refer to the DSM IV TR criteria for sadism for this assignment. Please find a real example of a serial murderer in history and provide examples from the individual that justifies that they meet the clinical definition of a sadist. If you want you may pick a character in a film. That said you MUST fully justify that the individual example meets the clinical definition for sadism. needs to be 1000 words, with APA 6th ed citations and references. Do Not Use MLA or any other form of referencing.
20160922175341forum_rubric_graduate_level_cj_1_.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Criminal Justice Forum Rubric (Graduate Level); 100 points total
Substance
(Possible 40
points)
Collaboratio
n (Possible
30 points)
Zero
Points
Zero
points:
Student
failed to
respond
to the
essay
question
Beginning
Developing
Accomplished
Exemplary
25 points:
Presentation
is unclear; a
basic
understandi
ng of the
topic and
issues is not
evident;
explanation
is lacking;
segments of
the required
answer are
lacking;
sources and
supporting
facts are not
utilized;
length
requirement
s may not
have been
met.
30 points:
Student’s
initial posting
did not meet
the length
requirement;
and/or
presentation
evidences
some
confusion
concerning
topics under
discussion;
analysis may
be lacking
and/or
elements of
the question
are not
answered;
support and
references
may be
lacking.
15 points:
Student filed
only one of
the required
replies OR
filed the
required
replies but
failed to
meet length
requirements
.
35 points: Student
answered/addresse
d most aspects of
the question/topic
posed in the Forum;
initial posting met
length requirement;
a basic
understanding of
relevant
concepts/theories is
demonstrated;
relevant sources
were located;
minimal or no
facts/examples
were used in
support of
presentation.
40 points: Student
answered/addresse
d all aspects of the
topic/question
posed in the Forum;
initial posting met
length requirement;
analysis of concepts
and theories clearly
demonstrates
superior knowledge
and a clear
understanding of
the topic; relevant
and scholarly
resources were
located and used
appropriately; facts
and examples are
used in support of
presentation.
25 points: Student
filed the minimum
number of replies,
meeting the length
requirements and
evidencing an
understanding of
the issues under
discussion and the
views of colleagues.
Student failed to
respond to specific
queries posed to
him by colleagues
or by the Instructor.
Student did not take
initiative in
advancing the
discussion
throughout the
week.
30 points: Student
filed at least the
number of required
replies and they
met the length
requirement; the
replies were
substantive,
thoughtful
responses and
contributed to the
discussion; student
exceeded minimum
requirements by
answering all
queries posed to
him by others and
remained present
and actively
engaged in the
discussion
Zero points:
Student
filed none of
the required
replies.
Criminal Justice Forum Rubric (Graduate Level); 100 points total
Timeliness
(Possible 10
points)
Writing
(Possible 10
points)
Zero
points:
Student
failed to
respond
to the
essay
question
Zero points:
Student
filed more
than two
required
postings in
an untimely
manner.
4 points:
Writing
contains
several
grammatical
,
punctuation,
and/or
spelling
errors.
Language
lacks clarity
or includes
some use of
jargon and
/or
conversation
al tone;
sentence
structure is
awkward.
2 points:
Student filed
two required
postings in an
untimely
manner.
7 points: Student
filed one required
posting in an
untimely manner.
6 points:
Student
demonstrates
consistent
and correct
use of the
rules of
grammar
usage,
punctuation
and spelling,
with a few
errors; there
is room for
improvement
in writing
style and
organization.
8 points: Student
demonstrates
consistent and
correct use of the
rules of grammar
usage, punctuation,
and spelling.
Language is clear
and precise
throughout all
submissions.
Sentences display
consistently strong,
varied structure and
organization is
excellent.
throughout the
week; student led
the discussion by
raising complex
issues, connecting
concepts, and
illuminating the
discussion with
examples.
10 points: Student
filed all required
postings in a timely
manner.
10 points: Student
demonstrates a
quality of writing
consistent with
scholarly works in
the relevant
discipline; student
is facile in the use of
subject-matter
vocabulary and
terminology
consistent with the
level of instruction;
student applies
concepts with ease;
writing style and
organization are
designed to
successfully convey
the message and the
related information
to the reader with
maximum effect.
Criminal Justice Forum Rubric (Graduate Level); 100 points total
Citations
(Possible 10
points)
Zero points:
Student
failed to
include
citations
and/or
references
4 points:
Citations of
reference
sources
exist;
citations
apparently
correspond
to the
correct
source but
do not
enable the
reader to
locate the
source. APA
6th edition
format not
evident.
6 points:
Attempts to
cite reference
sources are
made, but the
reader has
difficulty
finding the
sources;
attempts to
use APA 6th
edition
format are
evident but
poorly
executed
8 points: Reference
sources are cited as
necessary, but some
components of the
citations are
missing and/or APA
6th edition format is
faulty in some
respects.
10 points:
Reference sources
relied on by the
student are cited
appropriately and
accurately. No
writing of others is
left without
quotation and/or
attribution, as
appropriate. APA
6th edition format is
used correctly and
consistently.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Recent Comments