answered: this is a peer discussion reply be kind with the peer talk a

  

this is a peer discussion reply
be kind with the peer
talk about highlights topics in the peer discutions
please note impotant my instructor use turnitin 7% or lees score to accept my work
please send me thebplahiarism report with less than 7%
Researchers seek to minimize harm and risks while maximizing benefits when researching human beings. In addition, researchers respect human dignity, confidentiality, and autonomy, observe special precautions when dealing with vulnerable populations, and endeavor to distribute the benefits and burdens of research fairly. Thus, scholars must adhere to a particular code of conduct when collecting data from the population. Observing all of these ensures the protection of participant rights, enhances validity and maintains scientific integrity. This discussion summarizes several ethical approaches used in five different research articles on human beings.
In the first article, Bohula and associates scrutinized the viability of the ICU division in the article by focusing on the patients admitted to the ICU with heart problems (Bohula et al., 2019). In this research, the examiners utilized several ethical approaches to enhance validity, protect rights, and maintain scientific integrity. For instance, the ethics committee reviewed and approved informed consent in Brigham, and all participating centers reviewed and approved it. Additionally, the research did not utilize personal health information from the registry database to uphold confidentiality. Finally, the researchers systematically communicated the study’s results, and the study was not plagiarized.
In a different article, Mehta et al. studied the utilization of enteral nourishment (EN) in India in the ICU nursing practice, which has been used worldwide across different societies (Mehta et al., 2018). Some of the ethical approaches used by the researchers include confidentiality. The participants’ privacy was upheld throughout the research since all identifying information was omitted from the report. Additionally, the study did not have research misconduct. In this case, there were no cases of data falsification and manipulation. Indeed, the researchers used international guidelines whenever Indian studies were not available. Finally, the work was not plagiarized, and results were communicated systematically, including practice guidelines for every step in the study.
The article “The core of patient-participation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is a subjective report conducted to investigate the impact of patient contribution in the ICU from patients’ experiences and perceptions (Anna et al., 2021). Several ethical approaches in the study included voluntary participation. There were 33 eligible patients in the study, and only 11 agreed to participate. The study ended up with only nine participants since two withdrew later, which signifies the freedom to wi9thdraw and participation without forcing the patients. Secondly, confidentiality is also evident in this study. While the study involved a face-to-face interview, implying that researchers knew the patients’ identities but did not reveal their names or personal information in the communication of results. Finally, every participant gave informed consent to partake in the interview.
The article, Barriers in accomplishing patient participation in the critical care unit seeks to recognize obstructions to patient participation in the emergency unit as acknowledged by critical medical attendants (Falk et al., 2019). The examiners observed ethical considerations throughout the research—for instance, anonymity. In the research, 17 nurses from two different institutions participated. This study did not collect the nurse’s personal information, like telephone numbers and IP addresses. Additionally, confidentiality was also considered in this study. Finally, the study was original, and the results were not fabricated and were communicated systematically.
Finally, the article Variables Related to Quality of Life among Individuals Living with a Stoma in Nonmetropolitan Regions researched the degree of and factors related to personal satisfaction among individuals living with a stoma in nonmetropolitan Australia (Ketterer et al., 2021). Confidentiality and anonymity are evident in this research since personal information and identities are not disclosed. Additionally, there was no misconduct since the only data collected was used for analysis. Finally, the work is original, and the results are communicated systematically based on analysis.
References:
Anna, S., Catharina, F., & Ann-Charlotte, F. (2021). The core of patient-participation in the Intensive Care Unit: The patient’s views. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 103119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103119
Bohula, E. A., Katz, J. N., van Diepen, S., Alviar, C. L., Baird-Zars, V. M., Park, J.-G., Barnett, C. F., Bhattal, G., Barsness, G. W., Burke, J. A., Cremer, P. C., Cruz, J., Daniels, L. B., DeFilippis, A., Granger, C. B., Hollenberg, S., Horowitz, J. M., Keller, N., Kontos, M. C., & Lawler, P. R. (2019). Demographics, Care Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to Cardiac Intensive Care Units: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Prospective North American Multicenter Registry of Cardiac Critical Illness. JAMA Cardiology, 4(9), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2467
Falk, A.-C. ., Schandl, A., & Frank, C. (2019). Barriers in achieving patient participation in the critical care unit. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 51, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2018.11.008
Ketterer, S. N., Leach, M. J., & Fraser, C. (2021). Factors Associated with Quality of Life Among People Living With a Stoma in Nonmetropolitan Areas. Nursing Research, Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnr.0000000000000511
Mehta, Y., Sunavala, J. D., Zirpe, K., Tyagi, N., Garg, S., Sinha, S., Shankar, B., Chakravarti, S., Sivakumar, M. N., Sahu, S., Rangappa, P., Banerjee, T., Joshi, A., & Kadhe, G. (2018). Practice Guidelines for Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients: A Relook for Indian Scenario. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine: Peer-Reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 22(4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_3_18