*Prior paper is attatched on files*
In the final paper, students are tasked with the job of taking one of their prior short papers, expanding on this project, and reaching a conclusive judgment about a specific ethical case study.
This paper should accomplish the following objectives:
1) A solid revision of your original case study assignment, resolving the shortcoming s of the original project. This can include a more robust account of the case study, refinement of the theoretical approach, and/or more careful appreciation of how to apply the theory to the case
2) A new theoretical discussion which both describes an additional ethical theory, and brings this into conversation with the original case study
3) A penultimate section in which students provide clear judgments about why one ethical approach is able to provide a more substantive, complete, or useful reading of the case study. This section should demonstrate a high-level and sophisticated account of the strengths a limits of each of these ethical approaches, and why the chosen case study allows us to better understand the conflict between these ethical theories
In addition to the final paper, students will be tasked with creating a short (~10min) presentation giving their classmates understanding of what was studied, how it was analyzed, and what conclusions were drawn. While there are no formal time minimums, for the sake of the class presentations will be cutoff if they exceed 15 minutes. This presentation will account for 25% of the grade for the final assignment.
Recent Comments