Solved by a verified expert:Assignment 8.1: Changes in Older AdultsDescriptionIn this assignment you will write a 2-3 page paper in which you compare and contrast clinical depression with the sadness associated with the normal losses of aging. You will also identify and describe common cognitive and physical changes that occur in this stage of life.ObjectivesIdentify common physical and cognitive changes of aging in older adults.Compare and contrast clinical depression with the sadness that may be associated with the normal losses of aging.Explain the roles social, spiritual, work, and family factors play in late life.InstructionsWrite at 2-3 page paper in which you describe at least 3 common cognitive changes and 3 common physical changes in older adults. Then you will identify and explain the roles social, spiritual, work, and family factors play in late life. Finally, you will compare and contrast clinical depression with the sadness associated with the normal losses of aging.Assignment Submission:The use of outside resources is strongly recommended and all papers must be cited and written in APA format.Once you have completed the assignment, click the Submit Assignment option in the menu to the right and select a format for submitting your assignment.Click the Submit Assignment button when you are ready.RubricWriting Assignments 8.1 RubricWriting Assignments 8.1 RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsAssignment IdeasIdeas are clear, insightful, thought-provoking, and focused so that they consistently support the topic, thesis and audience for the paper.8.0 ptsIdeas are clear and focused to support the topic and a clearly-stated central idea, but are not consistently insightful or thought-provoking.5.0 ptsIdeas are clear but conventional or general, and support the topic, thesis, and audience for the paper.3.0 ptsIdeas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the topic or a central idea, which may be vague or missing.0.0 pts8.0 ptsAssignment DevelopmentDevelopment is fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.8.0 ptsDevelopment is adequate, but may lack depth, with details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence in support of sound logic.5.0 ptsDevelopment is sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps not interesting details, examples, and evidence that include no logical fallacies or unsupported claims.3.0 ptsDevelopment is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that may include logical fallacies or unsupported claims.0.0 pts8.0 ptsOrganizationOrganization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.8.0 ptsOrganization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs5.0 ptsOrganization is coherent and unified overall in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan, but is ineffective at times and may demonstrate abrupt or weak transitions between ideas or paragraphs.3.0 ptsOrganization is confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability.0.0 pts8.0 ptsStyle & MechanicsReadable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, precise word choice and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Mastery of style)8.0 ptsStyle is readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, effective word choice, and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Effective style)5.0 ptsStyle is readable, but unremarkable in tone, sometimes including a lack of sentence variety effective word choice, or some distracting, but not serious, errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Readable but inconsistent style)3.0 ptsStyle is incoherent or inappropriate in tone, including a lack of sentence variety, ineffective or inappropriate word choice, and serious errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation. (Ineffective style)0.0 pts8.0 ptsFormatFormat is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly to support the essay’s purpose/plan.8.0 ptsFormat is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works generally to support the essay’s purpose/plan.5.0 ptsFormat is mostly correct, meets critical aspects of assignment directions, and works mostly to support the essay’s purpose/ plan.3.0 ptsFormat is faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignment direction, and does not support the essay’s purpose/ plan.0.0 pts
Recent Comments