I need some assistance with these assignment. understanding of nature in to build a fire by jack london Thank you in advance for the help! In this plot, London suggests how an individual needs to consider that, regardless of how much he or she may contemplate that they can manage something, nature will impact their endeavors. This means individual perceptions have defects and often do not supersede nature. According to Kennedy and Gioia, London depicts an elderly person’s point of view as superior to that of the younger generations. This wisdom is presented in the elderly man from Sulphur Creek. The elderly character had issued an alert to the younger character about his impending excursion into the wilderness where the adverse weather is the order of the day. The young man chooses to take the warning less seriously and sets out to the wasteland anyway. At this point, London shows the reader that, though the younger generation’s point of view is important to make individual decisions, the older people offer better advice based on their past experiences, which usually span several decades. The elderly people are experienced enough to predict what is viable or worthwhile. Evans indicates that London carefully sneaks in the subject of harsh individualism to demonstrate how sometimes people cannot live on their own (159). On the other hand, Kennedy and Gioia point out that if the adventurer had been accompanied by a friend instead of a pet, the two would have shared their different points of view and settled on the best move to save the man’s life in the face of adversity (116). Instead, the man chose to ignore anyone’s point of view, perhaps to demonstrate that he is a turf character and thus could make it alone. Worse still, by choosing to advance his own point of view regarding the excursion, the character most probably had nothing to demonstrate to the public but to boost his self-esteem. London notes that “the dog had learned fire, and it wanted fire,” perhaps to create a flashback to the old man’s point of view. This implies that the temperature would be unbearable and as predicted was now taking the toll on the man and his only companion – the dog (1). Nonetheless, the man refused to heed the dog’s warning signals. he thought that by fretting, the dog was merely reacting to the difficult journey. This way, the dog suggests to the man that it was inappropriate to break the adverse weather by moving any further. In conclusion, the man’s point of view contributes to the meaning of the story by helping to cut the image of a self-centered individual who does not listen to friends and associates such as the elderly man. Worse still, he fails to read the mood of the dog in regard to difficult journey despite having it accompany him. According to London, the ruggedness of the man’s point of view instilled extreme courage and zeal in him to the point that he saw nothing wrong with continuing his journey in a temperature “fifty degrees below zero” (1). London uses the character to symbolize certain individuals who ooze of overconfidence and think that they can exist without anybody’s help. The author shows that if an individual tries to live on their own, then regardless of their confidence and capability, the unexpected often happens.&nbsp.