In your first paper, you explored the notion of updating the Constitution, either via congressional action or through a convention of states.  In this forum, consider the class to be such a convention, with each student serving in the role of delegate.

For Post #1, provide a paragraph (or two) summary of your paper, and make a persuasive case for TWO changes to the constitution (amendments, removal, etc.). 
For Post #2, please review the first posts from your classmates.  Is there any community of consensus?  If our class represented delegates to a convention, what proposed amendments received super majority status?
For Post #3, discuss a classmates’ idea for constitutional change that you did not consider yourself.  What makes this idea either good or bad for our foundational document?