Experiments and Studies
 
This brief article outlines the highlights and flaws of the Stanford Prison Experiment and discusses why it is still controversial.
 
One of Psychology’s most famous experiments was flawed
 
Solomon Asch’s study examines conformity. Consider what you would have done in a similar situation. This article offers a deeper understanding of the implications of Asch’s study and other considerations researchers of the time ignored.
 
Out of the Asch Study
 
APA Code of Ethics
 
 
 
Instructions
 
Researchers must protect participants and be aware of appropriate methods for obtaining information. What ethical considerations are important to research? In about 2pages, write an analysis of the ethical concerns in the 3 diverse psychological research studies below. Be sure to include a paragraph of overall ethical consideration.
 
This paper should be 2-3 pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and references: see Rasmussen’s APA guide in the Resources tab, or by clicking here. Prior to submitting your paper, be sure you proofread your work to check your spelling and grammar. If you use any outside sources, please cite those sources in APA citation format.
 
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the ‘nature’ of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s studies really show. Plos Biology, 10(11), doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426
 
Larsen, K. S. (1974). Conformity in the Asch experiment. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 94(2), 303-304. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923224
 
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., & … Shoda, Y. (2011). ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive And Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252-256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081
 
Grading Rubric
 
F
 
F
 
C
 
B
 
A
 
0
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
Did not Submit
 
No Pass
 
Competence
 
Proficiency
 
Mastery
 
Not Submitted
 
No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 1.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, but lacks explanation.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, but explanation is underdeveloped.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, fully explains.
 
Not Submitted
 
No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 2.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, but lacks explanation.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, but explanation is underdeveloped.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, fully explains.
 
Not Submitted
 
No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 3.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, but lacks explanation.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, but explanation is underdeveloped.
 
Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, fully explains.
 
Not Submitted
 
No noticeable attempt to define anyethical considerations
 
Attempts to define ethical considerations with some supporting evidence.
 
Attempts to define ethical considerations with adequate supporting evidence.
 
Thoroughly critiques define ethical considerationswith strong supporting evidence.