Attach there is a complete guide for the requirements. It is a power point with 4 slides. Each slide must have the specific information that it is describe in the guideline. Thanks.
nr361_w2_patient_guide_www_guidelines.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR361: Information Systems in Healthcare
Patient Guide to the WWW:
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
PURPOSE
The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills of the professional nurse as a teacher
and educator. You are to prepare a guide that will serve as a handout to assist a specific patient
that you identify. Your guide or handout should help this patient find and evaluate reliable and
accurate information on the Internet (websites) related to his or her disease process or diagnosis.
You will develop the guide using Microsoft PowerPoint. PowerPoint is a versatile application that
lets you design slideshows and handouts. For this assignment, you will be using PowerPoint to
create a guide or handout that you may print and give to patients and families. You will be
submitting this PowerPoint file to the Dropbox.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcome.
CO #8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery
of nursing care. (PO #8)
POINTS
This assignment is worth a total of 175 points.
DUE DATE
The Patient Guide to the WWW PowerPoint assignment is due at the end of Week 2. Submit your
completed assignment to the Patient Guide to the WWW basket in the Dropbox by Sunday; 11:59
p.m. mountain time. You may consult the Policies, under the Course Home tab, for details regarding
late assignments. Late assignments will result in loss of points. Post questions about this
assignment in the weekly Q & A Forum.
DIRECTIONS
A. Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create four slides, which will be the basis of the guide or
handout. You are encouraged to cite your source(s) as it relates to your criteria slide. Other
citations are permitted, but this is not a requirement for the assignment.
1) Scenario Slide: This slide should include your name. Next, outline a brief scenario, then
identify a patient who is seeking information about a specific disease process or
diagnosis. Be sure to include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and the patient
or family member’s readiness to learn. Be specific.
Example:
Scenario for Mr. Jones
Jane Doe (your name here)
•
Mr. Jones is a 54-year-old male recently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
•
His wife has accompanied him to the oncologist’s office.
•
Both have a high school education.
NR361_Pt_Guide_Guidelines.docx
3/16/15
JM
1
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR361: Information Systems in Healthcare
•
Mr. Jones has no interest in his diagnosis; his father died at an early age from
pancreatic cancer, and he thinks nothing can be done.
•
Mrs. Jones is greatly interested in any treatment; she has been searching on the
Internet for alternative cures.
•
Mrs. Jones has asked the nurse for help on how to determine whether a website is
credible.
2) Criteria Slide: This slide should address at least four criteria used to evaluate websites.
View Evaluating Internet Health Information: A Tutorial from the National Library of
Medicine at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/webeval/webeval_start.html, your text,
and other references. The task is to explain how to determine the credibility of websites
and teach it to the patient and/or caregiver described in the Scenario Slide. Concentrate
on evaluation of information, not how to search. Assume that the patient or caregiver has
basic Internet searching skills, a computer in the home, and can enter words in the query
box in a search engine, such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, and so forth. The idea is to teach
your patients how to evaluate websites (suspect and credible) as they relate to a specific
disease process or diagnosis.
The format of the criteria should be logical and easy to read, for example, a table,
checklist, or Q & A. Be creative! Language should be appropriate for the educational
level of the audience, in other words, the patient and/or caregiver as described in the
Scenario Slide. Note: This is the only slide that requires a citation.
3) Suspect Site Slide: This slide should give the name and description of a suspect
website. The suspect website must be related to the disease or diagnosis identified in
the scenario. However, the site does not meet the criteria for a credible site, for example,
gives inaccurate information, and so forth. You must provide a working link to the site.
Wikipedia is not acceptable! Explain why the site is suspect based on the criteria you
outlined in the Criteria Slide.
4) Credible Site Slide: This slide should give the name and description of a credible
website that you would recommend to the patient and/or caregiver/family member. The
website must be appropriate for the general public and address the disease process or
diagnosis identified in the Scenario Slide. Avoid sites that are aimed at healthcare
professionals. Explain why the site is credible based on criteria that you outlined in the
Criteria Slide.
B. If you need assistance using PowerPoint, search tutorials about how to use PowerPoint on
the Microsoft Office site.
C. The following are the scholarly writing requirements for this assignment.
a. Your name appears on the Scenario Slide.
b. Four slides should be submitted. Points will be deducted for additional slides.
c.
The four slides pertain to the
I.
scenario;
II.
criteria for selection of credible sites;
III.
suspect site; and
IV.
credible site.
d. The links for the suspect and credible sites are working and formatted correctly.
NR361_Pt_Guide_Guidelines.docx
3/16/15
JM
2
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR361: Information Systems in Healthcare
e. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct with no spelling or grammatical
errors.
f.
Graphics, colored slides, and interesting backgrounds are welcome; however, they
are not part of the criteria for this assignment and are not considered for grading
purposes.
D. Review the section on Academic Honesty found in the RNBSN Policies. All work must be
original (in your own words) unless properly cited.
GRADING CRITERIA
Category
Points
%
Scenario
Slide
35
20%
Scenario is clear and concise, including a disease process or diagnosis
as well as the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to
learn.
Criteria Slide
40
23%
Format of criteria is logical and easy to read, for example, a table,
checklist, or Q & A. Criteria for websites are clear and concise. Specific
citation for criteria is noted.
Suspect
Website
Slide
40
23%
Suspect site is not appropriate for general public, gives inaccurate
information, or does not address identified needs of patient/caregiver or
the diagnosis/disease indicated.
Suspect
Website
Slide
Working Link
5
2.5%
Credible
Website
Slide
40
23%
Credible website selected is appropriate for general public. Site
addresses disease or diagnosis and offers general information for the
public.
Credible
Website
Working Link
5
2.5%
Link to recommended site is operational.
Scholarly
Writing and
Formatting
10
6%
175
points
100%
Total
NR361_Pt_Guide_Guidelines.docx
Description
Link to the suspect site is operational.
• Name of student appears on Scenario Slide or Cover Slide
• Four slides are provided.
o Scenario
o Criteria
o Suspect Site
o Credible Site
• Punctuation and sentence structure are correct.
• Evidence of spell and grammar check
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above
requirements.
3/16/15
JM
3
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR361: Information Systems in Healthcare
GRADING RUBRIC
A
Outstanding or
Highest Level of
Performance
B
Very Good or High
Level of
Performance
C
Competent or
Satisfactory Level
of Performance
F
Poor or Failing or
Unsatisfactory
Level of
Performance
Scenario Slide
35 points
Scenario is a clear
and concise
description of
patient with a
specific disease or
diagnosis who is
seeking information,
including the
nurse’s assessment
of learning needs
and readiness to
learn.
32–35 points
Scenario is not
clear and concise
with description of
patient with specific
disease or
diagnosis. Scenario
does not describe
the nurse’s
assessment of
learning needs OR
does not include
readiness to learn.
30–31 points
Scenario exceeds
more than one
slide.
Scenario does not
describe
assessment of
learning needs and
readiness to learn.
Description of
disease process or
diagnosis is
missing.
27–29 points
Scenario exceeds
more than one
slide. Description of
disease process or
diagnosis is
missing. Learning
needs and/or
readiness to learn
are not addressed.
Demographic
information is
missing.
0–26 points
Criteria Slide
40 points
At least four criteria
are included and
are logical and easy
to read; for
example, a table,
checklist, or Q & A.
Citation is provided.
37–40 points
Three criteria are
included and are
not logical or easy
to read. Formatting
is not apparent.
Citation is missing.
34–36 points
Two criteria are
included and are
not logical or easy
to read. Formatting
is incorrect. Citation
is missing.
30–33 points
Only one criterion is
included.
Formatting is
incorrect. Citation is
missing.
0–29 points
Suspect
Website Slide
40 points
Suspect website is
appropriate for
general public and
clearly identifies
areas of concern
based on Criteria
Slide.
37–40 points
Suspect website is
appropriate for
general public but
areas of concern
related to Criteria
Slide are difficult to
determine.
34–36 points
Suspect website is
not appropriate for
general public but
areas of concern
related to Criteria
Slide are apparent.
30–33 points
Suspect website is
not appropriate for
general public and
areas of concern
related to Criteria
Slide are NOT
apparent.
0–29 points
Suspect
Website Slide
Working Link
5 points
Link to suspect site
is operational and
leads to indicated
site.
5 points
Link to suspect site
is nonoperational
but placing URL in
browser leads to
indicated site.
4 points
Link to suspect site
is nonoperational
and placing URL in
browser does NOT
lead to indicated
site.
3 points
Link for suspect site
is not provided.
0–2 points
Credible
Website Slide
40 points
Credible website is
appropriate for
general public. Site
is directly related to
disease process or
diagnosis and offers
appropriate
Credible website is
geared to the
healthcare provider
rather than the
general public. It
addresses disease
process or
Credible website is
geared to the
healthcare provider
rather than the
general public. It
addresses disease
process or
Website chosen is
not credible and the
evaluation does not
relate to the criteria
indicated on Criteria
Slide.
0–29 points
Assignment
Criteria
NR361_Pt_Guide_Guidelines.docx
3/16/15
JM
4
Chamberlain College of Nursing
B
Very Good or High
Level of
Performance
C
Competent or
Satisfactory Level
of Performance
information. It
clearly identifies
areas of concern
based on Criteria
Slide.
37–40 points
diagnosis but does
offer appropriate
information for the
general public.
Does not identify
areas of concern
based on Criteria
Slide.
34–36 points
diagnosis but does
not offer any
appropriate
information for the
general public.
Areas of concern
based on Criteria
Slide are not
apparent.
30–33 points
Credible
Website Slide
Working Link
5 points
Link to credible site
is operational and
leads to indicated
site.
5 points
Link to credible site
is nonoperational
but placing URL in
browser leads to
indicated site.
4 points
Link to credible site
is nonoperational
and placing URL in
browser does NOT
lead to indicated
site.
3 points
Link for credible site
is not provided.
0–2 points
Scholarly
Writing and
Formatting
10 points
• Name of student
appears on
Scenario Slide or
Cover Slide.
• Four slides are
provided.
o Scenario
o Criteria
o Suspect
Website
o Credible
Website
• Grammar,
punctuation, and
sentence
structure are
correct.
• Evidence of spell
and grammar
check.
9–10 points
• No student
identification
noted.
• Minimal errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
and/or sentence
structure noted.
• Minimal
indicators of
spelling or
grammar errors
(red or green
wavy lines).
8 points
•
•
Assignment
Criteria
A
Outstanding or
Highest Level of
Performance
NR361: Information Systems in Healthcare
•
•
No student
identification
noted.
Several errors
in grammar,
punctuation,
and/or sentence
structure noted.
Several
indicators of
spelling or
grammar errors
(red or green
wavy lines).
7 points
F
Poor or Failing or
Unsatisfactory
Level of
Performance
•
•
•
No student
identification
noted.
Multiple typos
noted.
Multiple
grammar and
punctuation
errors noted.
No evidence of
proofreading
prior to
submitting
assignment.
0–6 points
Total Points Possible = _____/175
NR361_Pt_Guide_Guidelines.docx
3/16/15
JM
5
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Recent Comments