Hello,I wrote an argument and when I submitted it to my prof. he said that I need to revise it and focus more on my audience. I need someone who can make my paper stronger and I am not just talking about the grammar mistakes.I am talking about the quality of the paper and how well the audience will understand my argument.** I have attached my argument (word document) and the three articles I used to write the paper. ** Here are what the professor requested: Part 1:Read the attached word document and revise the argument with explicit focus on increasing its appeal to your audience. For example, where the first paper you might have begun with your reasons for supporting your point, in this paper you might want to address/state the warrants (assumptions) that your audience may need to know and agree with before can listen to your perspective. The purpose of this revision is not to simply “add” more information to your paper. Rather, I’m really wanting you to be mindful of how to make your paper more rhetorically sound.Part 2:At the end of the paper, include a 250-300 word reflection explaining the choices you made in your revision. Describe to me the changes you made and explain how or why these changes are intended to enhance your argument’s effectiveness at moving its audience. You need to be very specific as to why you made some changes.**Please be sure to read first and understand what the prof. is looking for.I appreciate the help. Thank you.
the_argument._.docx

activity_theory_an_introduction_kain_and_wardle.pdf

coaches_can_read__too_branick.pdf

stylus_3_1_marroo.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Running head: CHARACTERISTICS OF ACADEMIC WRITING
Characteristics of Academic Writing
Introduction
Writing is a skill that can be possessed naturally and acquired through both formal and
informal learning processes. The style a writer adopts in his or her piece is dependent on the type
of audience that it was meant for or in the case of technical writing, the specific requirements of
the audience. The need to be objective by adopting and maintain a scholarly position is one of
the transitional challenges that these students face when writing assignments and papers for
various disciplines. Also, the linear nature of academic writing in the English Language poses
difficulty in the organization of ideas and concepts that are expressed in the material. In this
instance, the problem lies with ensuring that every paragraph and the sentences used to construct
them contributes to the audiences’ understanding of the line of argument or its central theme.
Also, the purpose of objectivity in this genre of writing that entails staying on a particular path
without repetitions and digressions, as well as the need to inform and entertain makes academic
writing a bit challenging for a lot of students. While professors endeavor to teach their students
the particular style of writing for their courses, the lack of an extensive and detailed manual on
scholarly writing is contributing to the level of anguish and frustration that students face. It is
believed that a paper on the characteristics of academic writing that factors the complexities of
different sub genres of the writing style can help students develop their writing skills both within
and outside the classroom. Also, an understanding of this nature would help them to become
authority in their respective disciplines through the sourcing and adopting of information from
credible sources. Until this type of publication is created to complement existing ones produced
by various professional associations such as the American Psychological Association (APA), a
detailed solution to the problem would remain unattainable.
1
CHARACTERISTICS OF ACADEMIC WRITING
Elements of Academic Writing
Gillett (2008) stated that complexity is an element of academic writing that separates it
from other forms of formal writing and verbal communication. He noted that main distinguishing
factor between written and spoken language is the longer length of words in the former than the
latter. The vocabulary and lexicon used in creating scholarly materials for an assigned topic vary
and denser than other genres. One of the reasons for this difference is the need to use a higher
number of noun-based phrases than verb-based ones. An additional complexity issue experienced
by prospective writers is the utilization of shorter sentences that follow the rule of grammar
including the use of subordinate clauses. Depending on the type of essay or requirement of the
instructor, writing for educational purposes is very formal since it requires the avoidance of
colloquial words and expressions. The implication of this requirement is that the writing in the
first and second person is less acceptable than the third person, which is more precise since facts
and figures are presented so as to maintain objectivity.
Meanwhile, the objectivity element of academic writing is an additional feature that
differentiates it from other formal forms since it makes it possible for the writer to limit his or
her opinion on the subject unless such approach is required. Therefore, he or she focuses on the
clear and concise presentation of the arguments and their support evidence, which increases the
need to use nouns and adjectives than other parts of speech. An additional element of academic
writing that makes it challenging for college freshmen and requires extensive practice is the use
of various type of signaling words that create an explicit connection between various parts of the
text (Branick, 2014). Also, explicitness also allows the writer to fulfill his or her responsibility to
the audience or readers to understand the roles of these parts to the overall goal of the piece of
writing.
2
CHARACTERISTICS OF ACADEMIC WRITING
According to Kain & Wardle (2014), students in the effort to avoid plagiarism paraphrase
words that make them inaccurate regarding the use of the wrong vocabulary that distorts their
meaning. For example, some words in the English Language have specific meanings that are
altered when replaced with other words. Further, one of the major requirements of academic
writing for any subject or discipline is the need to decide on a position, stick to it, and be certain
on the strengths of the claims that are made by the author. The fact that different subjects have a
specific preference for this part of the writing makes it imperative to the student to be wellorganized in his or her working. The content of scholarly publications must follow a logical
pattern that allows easy flow from introduction to conclusion. The final element of academic
writing that is required for the successful presentation of ideas and arguments is responsibility.
Students must understand that one of the purposes of their education is to develop a sense of
responsibility for their actions and claims. This character is expected to be reflected in the papers
they write during their undergraduate program. Therefore, they must be responsible for the
sources derived from their research for the purpose of referencing is to give the audience an
ability to verify the information.
Conclusion
As a conclusion, the proper use of the elements above are the general ones required to
fulfill the requirements of academic writing for various topics from different disciplines.
Meanwhile, there is a need to understand the requirement of various professional associations for
citing and referencing sources. The reason for this suggestion is that they have different styles for
this part of the writing process especially if the research is a technical one and disciplinespecific.
3
CHARACTERISTICS OF ACADEMIC WRITING
References
Branick, S. (2014). Coaches Can Read Too: An Ethnographic Study of a Football Coaching
Discourse Community. Downs and Wardle, 557-73.
Gillett, A. (2008). Academic writing: Features of academic writing. Retrieved July, 13, 2008.
Kain, D., & Wardle, E. (2014). Activity theory: An introduction for the writing
classroom. Writing about writing (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin.
4
The Genres of Chi Omega: An
Activity Analysis
VICTORIA MARRO
Produced in Elizabeth Wardle’s Fall 2011 ENC1102
 
Introduction
Sororities   have   existed   for   over   100   years   and   have   maintained   their   values   even   as   time  
passes   and   chapters   become   farther   apart.   One   way   these   organizations   have   been   able   to   keep  
these  traditions  is  through  the  use  of  various  genres.  According  to  the  work  of  writing  researchers  
such  as  Amy  Devitt,  genres  are  flexible  responses  to  fit  the  needs  of  a  discourse  community  or  social  
setting.   A   discourse   community   is   a   group   with   agreed   upon   goals,   communication,   the   use   of  
genres,  feedback,  a  threshold  level  of  membership  and  specified  language  (Johns).  Researchers  Amy  
Devitt,  Anis  Bawarshi  and  Mary  Jo  Reiff  have  looked  at  the  way  that  genres  serve  the  needs  of  juries,  
doctors’  offices,  and  classrooms.  According  to  these  researchers,  “genre  study  allows  students  and  
researchers   to   recognize   how   ‘lived   textuality’   plays   a   role   in   the   lived   experience   of   a   group”  
(Bawarshi,  Devitt,  and  Reiff  542).    
One  community  that  plays  a  big  part  in  my  life  and  in  the  lives  of  300,000  other  women  is  
my   sorority,   Chi   Omega.   Usually,   research   done   on   Greek   life   involves   eating   disorders   and  
problems  with  hazing,  but  such  issues  should  not  define  these  organizations.  Not  enough  research  
has  been  done  on  the  complex  genre  systems,  or  genre  sets,  used  by  sororities  and  fraternities.  A  
genre  set,  as  defined  by  Charles  Bazerman,  is  a  group  of  several  genres  that  predictably  recur  inside  
a   domain-­‐specified   community   (Honig   91).   A   genre   system,   as   defined   by   Amy   Devitt,   is   a   “set   of  
genres   interacting   to   achieve   an   overarching   function   within   an   activity   system”   (Bawarshi   and  
Reiff   87).     Genre   sets   and   systems   are   important   with   regard   to   social   action   and   interact   to   further  
the  purposes  of  a  group.  By  analyzing  these,  social  roles  and  progress  become  much  clearer  within  
activity   systems:   “A   genre   system   includes   genres   from   multiple   genre   sets,   over   time,   and   can  
involve   the   interaction   of   users   with   different   levels   of   expertise   and   authority,   who   may   not   all  
have  equal  knowledge  of  or  access  to  all”  (Bawarshi  and  Reiff  88).  In  an  organization  as  large  as  Chi  
Omega,  this  is  incredibly  important  because  the  levels  of  authority  and  expertise  of  members  varies  
so  greatly.  Bazerman  has  previously  looked  at  the  use  of  genre  systems  in  classrooms  and  in  the  US  
patent   application   process   (Bawarshi   and   Reiff   88).   In   this   paper,   I   will   look   at   the   genres   used  
within  Chi  Omega  and  how  the  use  of  genre  systems  help  the  173  collegiate  chapters  of  Chi  Omega  
function   both   independently   and   together   as   one   activity   system.   For   the   purposes   of   this   paper,   an  
activity   system   functions   in   a   similar   fashion   to   a   discourse   community,   with   laid   out   purposes,  
tools,   rules,   subject,   community   and   a   division   of   labor.   This   will   be   further   explained   in   my  
discussion.   I   will   look   at   the   different   genres   that   are   used,   as   well   as   the   different   ways   that   the  
same   genre   may   be   used   by   different   chapters,   examining   the   ways   that   the   same   tool   can   serve  
completely  different  purposes  for  different  chapters.  I  will  specifically  look  at  the  genres  we  use  in  
my  chapter  today,  and  how  these  genres  are  utilized  to  further  the  goals  of  Chi  Omega.  
 
STYLUS 3.1 | SPRING 2012
 
Methods
 
I   interviewed   two   sisters   in   other   Chi   Omega   chapters,   including   Emily,   an   active   sister   in  
the   Eta   Delta   chapter   at   the   University   of   Florida   and   Summer,   an   active   sister   of   the   Psi   Kappa  
chapter   at   Clemson   University.   Their   names   have   been   changed.   These   sisters   were   asked   what  
technologies   their   executive   boards   used   to   communicate   with   them;   about   genres   used   by  
chapters   such   as   a   weekly   newsletter,   Billhighway   and   the   GIN   system;   and   their   opinion   on   the  
effectiveness  of  said  genres.  These  sisters  were  asked  their  opinions  on  the  importance  of  writing  
and  ritual  to  Chi  Omega  nationally,  and  about  the  national  magazine,  The  Eleusis.    
 
An   interview   was   also   conducted   with   Brittany,   an   alum   from   the   Psi   Mu   chapter   of   Chi  
Omega  at  the  University  of  Central  Florida.  Her  name  has  been  changed  as  well.  She  was  asked  how  
the  executive  board  communicated  with  the  sisters  during  her  time  in  the  chapter,  about  a  weekly  
newsletter,   the   GIN   system,   and   her   opinion   on   the   effectiveness   of   these   genres.   She   was   asked  
about   her   involvement   in   an   alumnae   chapter   and   the   genres   that   were   used   within   that   chapter.  
She  was  also  asked  about  the  national  magazine,  The  Eleusis.    
 
The   Psi   Mu   chapter   secretary,   Allison,   was   interviewed   about   the   writing   she   does   for   the  
chapter   and   the   way   she   became   versed   in   these   genres.   She   was   asked   her   opinion   on   the  
effectiveness   of   the   GIN   system   and   the   problems   with   this   system.   Other   questions   included   her  
opinions   on   the   importance   of   writing   to   the   national   organization   and   whether   or   not   she   reads  
The  Eleusis.    
 
I   also   interviewed   Psi   Mu   chapter   president,   Nicole.   Nicole   was   asked   about   how   the   GIN  
system  came  into  effect  and  what  methods  of  communication  were  used  prior  to  this  system.  She  
was  asked  about  the  ritual  text,  but  at  the  request  of  the  chapter  secretary,  these  responses  will  not  
be   included.   Like   in   all   of   the   other   interviews,   she   was   asked   if   she   read   The  Eleusis.   As   the   chapter  
president,  she  was  asked  about  her  communication  with  other  chapters  and  with  nationals,  and  her  
opinion  on  the  importance  of  writing  and  written  communication  to  the  organization  as  a  whole.    
 
Over  twenty  genres  were  collected  and  analyzed  including  the  GIN  system,  The   Eleusis,  the  
weekly   newsletter,   announcements,   files   and   others.   The   importance   of   genres   that   could   not   be  
accessed,  such  as  the  written  rituals  and  the  Book  of  Rules,  were  analyzed  as  well.  Activity   triangles  
were  constructed  for  Chi  Omega  as  a  national  organization,  as  well  as  for  individual  chapters  and  
genres.   Database   searches   were   conducted   and   previous   research   was   synthesized   to   support  
findings.  
Activity   triangles   were   constructed   to   analyze   the   activity   systems,   Chi   Omega   nationally,  
the  Psi  Mu,  Psi  Kappa  and  Eta  Delta  chapters,  and  the  GIN  system.  Activity  theory,  which  says  that  
people   write   as   part   of   an   activity   system,   can   be   displayed   in   a   triangle,   with   tools   at   the   top,  
subject  on  the  middle  left,  object  on  the  middle  right,  rules  in  the  lower  left,  the  community  in  the  
lower   middle,   and   division   of   labor   in   the   lower   right-­‐hand   corner.   A   series   of   arrows   inside   the  
triangle  shows  how  each  portion  is  connected  to  the  others  (see  Figure  1  below).  
 
Figure  1  Organization  of  an  Activity  System                                                                  
 
26
MARRO | THE GENRES OF CHI OMEGA
 
Results and Discussion
Through   activity   analysis,   I   found   that   the   chapters   of   Chi   Omega   all   write   in   different  
genres;   however,   all   of   the   chapters   share   the   same   goals,   which  
are  laid  out  in  the  mission  statement,  a  shared  genre.  I  found  that   Through activity analysis,
this   mission   statement   is   broken   up   into   six   parts,   and   each   of   I found that the chapters
those   has   a   director,   which   makes   up   the   cardinal   cabinet.   Each  
director  works  with  a  specific  genre  set,  and  these  together  make   of Chi Omega all write in
up   a   genre   system.   In   the   Psi   Mu   chapter,   one   super-­‐genre   different genres; however,
encompasses  all  of  these  genres  sets  and  works  as  a  genre  system   all of the chapters share
within  that  genre.    
Chi   Omega   sorority   was   founded   in   1895   by   Dr.   Charles   the same goals, which are
Richardson,   Ina   May   Boles,   Jean   Vincenheller,   Jobelle   Holcombe,   laid out in the mission
and   Alice   Simonds.   Chi   Omega   has   initiated   over   300,000   statement, a shared genre.
members   and   has   173   collegiate   chapters.   The   tools   used   by   Chi  
Omega   nationally   are   the   written   rituals,   established   by   Dr.   …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment