Investigate at least two different spiritual assessment tools and analyze the ease of use and comprehensiveness of the data collected. Report on the validity and reliability of the tool. Explain how the spiritual assessment would be used in a health assessment.Write a 1,000–1,250-word paper on the items listed above. Include at least four professional references excluding your texts.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
spiritual_assessment_rubric.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Spiritual Assessment
1
No
2
Submissio Unsatisfactory
n
75.00%
0.00%
3
Less than
Satisfactory
80.00%
4
Satisfactory
88.00%
5
Good
92.00%
6
Excellent
100.00%
Does not describe Minimally
selected spiritual describes
assessment tools. selected spiritual
Assignment
assessment tools.
criteria has not Not all
been met.
parameters are
described. Lacks
both scope and
clarity.
Describes
selected spiritual
assessment tools.
Includes
rationale.
Description is
lacking in scope
or clarity.
Clearly describes
selected spiritual
assessment tools.
Includes brief
rationale.
Analysis of each
tool’s ease of use
and
comprehensivene
ss of data
collected is not
outlined or is
outlined poorly.
Ignores or
superficially
evaluates each
tool’s ease of use
and
comprehensivene
ss of data
collected. Draws
unwarranted or
fallacious
conclusions.
Surface level of
evaluation each
tool’s ease of use
and
comprehensivene
ss of data
collected is
offered. Claims
and ideas are
supported.
Analysis is direct,
competent, and
appropriate.
Examines each
tool’s ease of use
and
comprehensivene
ss of data
collected. Some
details are
provided.
20.0 %
None.
Validity and
Reliability
Description of
each tool’s
validity and
reliability is
either not
present or
incomplete.
Assignment
criteria has not
been met.
Minimally
Outline each
describes each
tool’s validity
tool’s validity
and reliability.
and reliability.
Statements may
Data lacks details lack depth of
and/or is
understanding or
incomplete.
detail.
Discussion
significantly lacks
depth.
20.0 %
None.
Explain How
Fails to explain Briefly lists how
how the spiritual the spiritual
Thoroughly and
comprehensively
describes
selected spiritual
assessment tools.
Includes in-depth
details. Presents
rationale for
selection.
Information and
evidence are
accurate,
appropriate, and
supported.
Thoughtfully
analyzes and
evaluates major
points of each
tool’s ease of use
and
comprehensivene
ss of data
collected. Draws
warranted,
judicious, nonfallacious
conclusions.
Information and
evidence are
accurate,
appropriate.
Thoroughly
presents
complete
information of
each tool’s
validity and
reliability.
Describes indepth and with
supporting
evidence Draws
warranted,
judicious, nonfallacious
conclusions.
Information and
evidence are
accurate,
appropriate.
Thoroughly and
comprehensively
70.0
%Content
10.0 %
None.
Spiritual
Assessment
Tools
Description
20.0 %
Analysis
None.
Provides a basic
clear description
of each tool’s
validity and
reliability. Some
details are
provided.
Evidence is
supportive.
Outlines in-depth Clearly explains
how the spiritual how the spiritual
the Spiritual
Assessment
Would Be
Used in a
Health
Assessment
20.0
%Organizatio
n and
Effectiveness
7.0 % Thesis None.
Development
and Purpose
8.0 %
None.
Argument
Logic and
Construction
5.0 %
None.
Mechanics of
Writing
(Includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
and language
use.)
10.0
%Format
5.0 % Paper None.
Format (Use
of
appropriate
assessment would assessment would assessment would assessment would explains how the
be used in a
be used in a
be used in a
be used in a
spiritual
health
health
health
health
assessment would
assessment. Fails assessment. Does assessment.
assessment.
be used in a
to defend
not adequately Provides
Provides solid
health
rationale.
defend rationale. adequate
reasoning.
assessment.
rationale with
Provides
minimal detail.
supportive and
thorough
rationale.
Paper lacks any
discernible
overall purpose
or organizing
claim.
Thesis and/or
Thesis and/or
main claim are
main claim are
insufficiently
apparent and
developed and/or appropriate to
vague; purpose is purpose.
not clear.
Statement of
Sufficient
Argument is
purpose is not
justification of
orderly, but may
justified by the claims is lacking. have a few
conclusion. The Argument lacks inconsistencies.
conclusion does consistent unity. The argument
not support the There are obvious presents minimal
claim made.
flaws in the logic. justification of
Argument is
Some sources
claims. Argument
incoherent and have
logically, but not
uses non-credible questionable
thoroughly,
sources.
credibility.
supports the
purpose. Sources
used are
credible.
Introduction and
conclusion
bracket the
thesis.
Surface errors are Frequent and
Some mechanical
pervasive enough repetitive
errors or typos
that they impede mechanical errors are present, but
communication of distract the
are not overly
meaning.
reader.
distracting to the
Inappropriate
Inconsistencies in reader. Correct
word choice
language choice sentence
and/or sentence (register),
structure and
construction are sentence
audienceused.
structure, and/or appropriate
word choice are language are
present.
used.
Template is not
used
appropriately, or
documentation
Appropriate
template is used,
but some
elements are
Appropriate
template is used.
Formatting is
correct, although
Thesis and/or
Thesis and/or
main claim are main claim are
clear and
comprehensive.
forecast the
The essence of
development of the paper is
the paper. It is contained within
descriptive and the thesis. Thesis
reflective of the statement makes
arguments and
the purpose of
appropriate to
the paper clear.
the purpose.
Argument shows Clear and
logical
convincing
progression.
argument
Techniques of
presents a
argumentation
persuasive claim
are evident.
in a distinctive
There is a smooth and compelling
progression of
manner. All
claims from
sources are
introduction to authoritative.
conclusion. Most
sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely Writer is clearly
free of
in command of
mechanical
standard,
errors, although a written,
few may be
academic English.
present. A variety
of sentence
structures and
effective figures
of speech are
used.
Appropriate
All format
template is fully elements are
used. There are correct.
virtually no errors
style for the
major and
assignment.)
5.0 %
None.
Research
Citations (Intext
citations for
paraphrasing
and direct
quotes, and
reference
page listing
and
formatting,
as
appropriate
to
assignment
and style.)
100 % Total
Weightage
format is rarely
followed
correctly.
missing or
some minor
in formatting
mistaken. A lack errors may be
style.
of control with present.
formatting is
apparent.
No reference
Reference page is Reference page is Reference page is In-text citations
page is included. present. Citations included and lists present and fully and a reference
No citations are are inconsistently sources used in inclusive of all
page are
used.
used.
the paper.
cited sources.
complete and
Sources are
Documentation is correct. The
appropriately
appropriate and documentation of
documented,
citation style is cited sources is
although some
usually correct. free of error.
errors may be
present.
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Recent Comments