I need revising and editing for 3 papers

  

I need revising and editing for 3 papers For paper 1 (Editorial): write a paragraph about how private suppliers or farmers of organic food would profit for it. Also, make the necessary changes on the conclusion. Please highlight any changes in red.For paper 2 (Evaluative): write a paragraph about how The Lion King reflects the idea of good dictator versus bad dictator. Also, make the necessary changes on the conclusion. Please highlight any changes in red.For paper 3 (Research): write a paragraph about what laws could the U.S. pass to curb sex trafficking?. Also, make the necessary changes on the conclusion. Please highlight any changes in red.
editorial.docx

evaluative.docx

research.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1
English 102
Editorial Assignment
Second Draft
Organic Food: Is It Worth It?
Organic foods are those that are produced without utilizing toxic chemicals such as
fertilizers and pesticides (Woese). For any food product to qualify as organic, its production must
have been on a soil that is free from harmful fertilizers and chemicals for at least three years
(Paul and Jyoti). Unlike inorganic food products whose productions are free from carcinogenic
substances, organic foods have received credits as one of the safest foods that people should
utilize. Therefore, if one is determined to protect their health and rapidly minimize the ability to
get cancer, all that one needs is to channel all the efforts towards organically produced grains,
vegetables, and fruits. Therefore, people decide to go for organic foods because of the popular
conception that they are more nutritious and environmentally safe for both plants and animals
than inorganic foods (Woese). Even to that extent, the use of these food faces numerous debates
whether it is right or wrong choice for consumers. After a proper observation of the benefits of
organic food, I encourage consumers to increase the use of organic foods to reduce carcinogenic
substances that inorganic foods present to the environment. In that context, this paper analyzes
the advantages and disadvantages of organic food and justifies why such are food is safe.
Compared to non-organic products, organic products rot easily because they lack artificial
preservatives. They are very expensive because they become people’s priority and they do not
consist of chemicals that are harmful to humans and animals’ lives. Conversely, production of
organic foods allows the utilization of the limited amount of chemicals. According to the French
Food Safety Agency, the consumption of organic food is not that more nutritious or safer than
food products produced using conventional methods (Woese). Additionally, consuming organic
2
food is perceived healthier than consuming similar non-organic products. According to the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), however, there is no consensus among scientists
about health benefits of organic food.
From the above discussions, some studies were conducted to compare organic products
such as eggs, meat, and milk, to non-organic foods. The primary aim of the study was to measure
the levels of nutrient elements and harmful contaminants, such as bacteria and pesticides, in the
selected food. Some studies attempted to find health distinctions between individuals who
restricted themselves to eating only non-organic or organic foods. Following the weighing of all
the research findings, the researchers concluded that organic food compared to non-organic food
did not appear to contain more nutrients or vitamins. For example, non-organic vegetables and
fruits had 30% probability of containing pesticides compared to organic vegetables and fruits.
Indeed, it is very infrequent to find a product that exceeds Food and Drug Administration
pesticide safety limits (Woese). In general, the researchers concluded that there was no concrete
evidence to support the idea that individuals who adhered to organic diets were healthier
compared to those who consumed non-organic foods. Moreover, processed organic foods in
contrast to non-organic foods do not contain hydrogenated fats (Smith-Spangler). This type of fat
is accompanied by a broad range of heart diseases such as cardiovascular illnesses. Therefore,
choosing organic options can enhance one’s protection of the heart.
For those who are greatly concerned with the manner in which animals handle it, the choice of
organic foods is an excellent idea. Organic farming ensures animals get natural diets and freerange conditions of toxic elements. (Smith-Spangler). Compared to non-organic foods, organic
foods have fewer amounts of pesticide residues. However, it is imperative to note that
conventionally grown vegetables and fruits may require production of fewer pesticide residues.
3
In fact, it is remarkably difficult to detect residues in 70% of organic foods assessed by the
Pesticides Residue Committee (Ames). Therefore, choosing non-organic food over organic food,
people are exposing themselves to various diseases and chemicals. Statistics indicates that a
conventional diet results to an individual consuming approximately 150mcg of pesticides on a
single day (Paul & Jyoti). This rate of consumption is quite dangerous because it increases the
chances of suffering from neurological damages. Equally, choosing conventionally produced
food in favor of organics signifies consumer’s support to the continuous poisoning of the
country’s water, air, and soil. That will become a greater burden for the future generations.
Therefore, looking at the benefits of organic foods and the rate at which they reduce substantial
diseases that could eliminate the human race, it is of good reason that people use them.
Despite persuasive indications that natural foods protect our environment and prevent
certain diseases, some people argue that because injurious pesticides have not attacked them,
they lack serious threats. However, I encourage these cynics to observe the modern environment
and listen to the plea from various organizations on ways to prevent cancer. If all people
recognized the paybacks of consuming foods with no chemicals, the world would significantly
reduce future cancer and risks of related diseases. Changing eating habits by going to natural and
organic food improves general health of the entire society. Foods that are grown free of
chemicals and pesticides reduce the risk of chronic diseases, help to ensure a clean environment,
and reduce exorbitant health costs. Therefore, I encourage everyone to consume organically
grown food products as often as possible to provide a wholesome life since they are safer than
inorganic foods.
4
Works Cited
Bruce, Ames, “Ranking Possible Carcinogenic Hazards.” Science 236.4799 (1987): 271.
Academic Search Complete,Web, 20 Jan 2017
Paul, Justin, and Jyoti Rana. “Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food”
Journal of Consumer Marketing (2012) 29:6 , 412-422, Web, 20 Jan 2017
Smith-Spangler “Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives?” Annals of
Internal Medicine 157.5 (2012): 348-366, Web, 20 Jan 2017
Woese, Katrin, Lange, Dirk, Boess, Christian, and Klaus W. Bogl. “A Comparison of
Organically and Conventionally Grown Foods ‒ Results of a Review of the Relevant
Literature.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 74.3 (1997): 281-93, Web, 20
Jan 2017
1
English 102
Evaluative Assignment
Second Draft
The Dual Dimension of the Lion King
What cannot be denied is how Disney films are loved in almost every corner of the
globe. This is because they tend to relate well with the society. Hitched to them is a realistic
feel. In 1994, Walt Disney released what could debatably be one of the best animated films of
all time, The Lion King. However, only few people have gone into detail to evaluate the deeper
meaning of the film. In the film, monarchical rule in the kingdom unreservedly accepted.
Privilege is also hereditary just as seen in the society. However, in such films villains will
always try to undermine such laid out conventions. A classic case is evident as Scar schemes
to murder the King Mufasa in order to seize the throne. I believe this dearly loved Disney film
is likely to shape the socio-political and cultural morals consumers.
The Lion King has a two-faced dimension. Although the film presents a monarchical
rule, it also presents ideas and efforts to undermine the existing rules. The values and notions
presented, however, tend to contradict sharply with the current democratic society. The Lion
King is more than a mere fable when deeply analysed. Given the film is animated; the general
society would naturally hold an opinion to believe that is dedicated for children. However, it
has a wealth of moral values.
The film opens with a theme song, The Circle of Life playing as the camera focuses on
the king of Pride Rock, Mufasa. The king holds his new-born son, Simba as Rafiki the mandrill
ushers in the audience. Particularly interesting however, the King’s brother is not present at the
ceremony. Instead, he is elsewhere lamenting over how he will never be king. He even says
that life is not fair. He is deeply hurt to the point of harassing Rafiki who returns back to inquire
why he was not in attendance. He even has dark colors, normally associated with ‘evil’ and a
jet black mane. This is an artistic trope that suggests that he is the villain. In the social arena,
2
young viewers of are likely to pick up Scar’s habits such as the selfish habits of feeling lesser
instead of rejoicing the success of their colleagues. Further support of the moral argument is
demonstrated by Nala, who has Simba’s best interests at heart. It should be noted that however,
Disney maintains its position as a business that sells nourishing fun for the entire family.
In more ways than we care to think, these values can be gainfully adopted by adults. In
his review article The Lion King, Ebert pointed out that the drawn animated feature was
surprisingly serious in its subject matter and was too intense for very young children. One of
the moral lessons is that some people come into one’s life to satisfy their own ulterior interests.
In a particular event, King Mufasa loses his life in an ugly stampede in the gully. In a perfectly
designed scheme, Simba is wrongly accused for his father’s death and is advised to run away
by his uncle. Effectively, Simba’s potential is suppressed by Scar’s efforts to usurp the throne.
As a means of entertainment in this era of controversy over “children’s entertainment”,
The Lion King is no exception to the perilous morals especially to the young generation. The
inherent dictatorship is quite frightening for its obsession with leadership. The idea of one-man
leadership is not at its slightest restrained in the film. In the Circle of Life, all animals in the
jungle including the antelopes and zebras flock together to see the newly born king-to-be. This
presents a sharp controversy to the natural order of the animal kingdom. The viewer of the film
is meant to accept the rule and stand powerless if not hushed at the presence of predator leaders.
As the film begins, a ceremony is underway to celebrate the newly-born king-to-be.
The leadership in the jungle is carried on through inheritance. Those who are in high places are
regarded as leaders. Leadership, as it is, is based on position. This fact forces Scar, Simba’s
uncle to plot the murder of King Mufasa. When he is eventually elevated as the king of Pride
Rock, he deluded to believe that every animal would follow his commands. As a leader, he is
unable to make proper choices and his lack of influence turns the back of the pride of lions
against him. Only the hyenas side with him. By virtue of this, the film might give the young
3
children, who are apparently the audience of the film a wrong perception. Leadership is not
based on position.
It would be difficult for children of a young age to understand the various symbolisms
used in The Lion King film. Looking at the sexuality of the characters of the film, Scar is painted
to have homosexual traits. He openly detests the union of King Mufasa and his wife Sarabi. He
also extends this dissatisfaction to Simba’s birth. In their conversation, Simba refers to him as
‘weird’ to which he responds ‘you have no idea’. Still, due to his seemingly weaker tendencies,
he is unable to kill Mufasa with his bare claws. Despite the freedom of sexuality, the film was
cast in a period when homosexuality was unnatural. Upon Scar’s death, rain puts off fires and
the land turns green again. This shows how heterosexuality triumphs over homosexuality. As
televised films play a role in shaping the culture of young lives, children are likely to be
influenced to adopt this unnatural way of sexuality.
Since its inception, Disney films adhere to the basic tenets of using emotional appeals
and master class story telling techniques to capture imaginations of the audience. Walt
Disney maintains consistent plots that follow their signature exegesis in their films. The plots
of Disney films have villains who fight champions viciously. They reign terror and cause so
much misery to the princess or the hero but in the end fail and are killed or they go psychotic.
Evil characters are the driving force behind Disney films who play the part of developing
heroes and heroines who stand for love, honesty, and goodness for all. Simba and Scar in The
Lion King are characters that bring happiness and hope to audiences. In broader terms, they
are the gist of the films. They are the reason theatres fill with film enthusiasts who crave to
see goodness prevailing evil.
The writer of the film presents scenes that could influence children watching the film
in both negative and positive ways. Masculinity and patriarchy are the propelling themes in
4
this film. In support of the thesis statement, specific discussed cases show how the film could
alter their socio-political moral perceptions of the viewers.
5
Works Cited
Ebert, Roger. “The Lion King Movie Review & Film Summary (1994) | Roger Ebert.” All
Content. N.p., 24 June 1994. Web. 15 Feb. 2017.
The Lion King. Dir. Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff. Walt Disney Pictures, 1994. Web. 15 Feb.
2017.
1
English 102
Research – 3rd draft
Sex Trafficking in the United States
Sex trafficking is already a severe crime in the United States that jeopardizes many lives.
Even worse, sex slave has left the lives of a great number of young girls and women turned
upside down. Trafficking of women and children has become an issue of global concern in recent
years. The crime has been made easier by defective boundaries and progressive communication
technologies; it has become a highly profitable and progressively global in scale. Unlike arms or
drugs, children and women are sold several times since the business produces billions of dollars
and works at a high discretion. Many young children and women do not think of leaving their
families to participate in the forced prostitution. However, what people do not know is that about
100,000 children under 16 years of age are forced to do the duties of a sex slave in various parts
of the country (Dempsey). Known to be a gainful business for the traders, many young girls and
women live in a fear that the owners of this illegal trade may expand their ambition and dreams.
Even with the several reports and observable statistics about human and sex trafficking, the
government has not implemented clear measures to solve this dangerous problem. Thus, the
citizens are questioning the credibility and effectiveness of the already implemented laws to curb
sex trafficking. Although some people argue that awareness is the principal way of stopping this
menace, I ascertain that effective implementation of legislation and developing efficient
intelligence systems will help to drag the perpetrators of this crime to justice.
Sex trafficking is a present-day slavery, an epidemic that affects millions of individuals
on a global scale. According to the International Labor Organization (ILO) and the U.S. State
Department, about 20 million persons worldwide are living under slavery and forced labor. The
ILO approximates that girls and women constitute the biggest share of human trafficking and
2
forced labor victims (Dempsey). Girls and women represents the vast majority of persons
trafficked exactly for moneymaking and sex exploitation, although men are also part of sex
trafficking. About 1.2 million girls and women are shepherded into the worldwide sex market
yearly through human trafficking (Nichols). Unluckily, increased access to the Internet has
facilitated and championed the trade of individuals in the business of sex trafficking. According
to Jefft, approximately 50% of trading victims are minors. While the projections vary, the U.S.
Department of Justice approximates that there are 14,000 to 17,000 overseas nationals trafficked
into the United States every year. A report by Department of Justice reveals that 100,000 to
300,000 children go missing each year in the U.S., which puts them at risk for trafficking. The
typical age of entry into the sex industry for children is 12-14 years. Nichols notes that many of
these victims are runaway girls and women who have undergone sexual abuse as children in their
societies. Victims of sex trafficking in the US come from anywhere; however, those at high risk
of being trafficked originate from poverty-stricken regions with weak gender equality of gender.
The observable effects of human and sex trafficking have raised heated debates on its
cause and possible solutions. While some debaters argue that there is a need to create awareness
about sex trafficking, Dempsey says that American have sufficient information hence they only
need effective laws to protect them. For example, in September 2012, President Obama devoted
an entire speech to the issue of modern slavery and human trafficking, speaking eloquently of
sex trafficking and human labor at home and worldwide. Moreover, just before the speech, the
public awareness that celebrated the 150th anniversary of an emancipation proclamation
highlighted the issue of sex trafficking as one of the illegal practices American people are facing.
Thus, it is not in order to argue that the lack of public awareness might be the cause of sex
trafficking. Instead, the country needs adequate laws to prevent human and sex trafficking.
3
The anti-trafficking setting is very impressive, principally with the much-predicted state
legislative efforts all over the country. Underneath the surface, however, gaps in implementation
and legislation of the laws echo a different reality. This is the reason many judges do not see
human-trafficking cases in the courtrooms (Kotrla).The first laws of the United State that have
been champions of sex trafficking are the immigration laws. These laws subject individuals to
sex trafficking in two main ways. First, according to Kotrla, 60% of individuals of these illegal
businesses are not American citizens; therefore, their purpose and how they enter the country
becomes a mystery for most people. It is in this context that it is arguably the immigration laws,
policies, and channels are not adequate enough to identify the right people who come into the
country. Jefft notes that America is one of the countries whose GDP is high hence several
persons want to earn a living in the country. However, the immigration laws have not
successfully managed the right people to enjoy such privileges.
Secondly, immigration policies and laws have been connected with multiple economic
hitches, including the lack of scientific talent and foreign business. This is a result of reduced
access to the kind of entrepreneurial interest characteristic of those willing to have their future in
other countries. As such, some people have no ways of getting money, so they resort to illegal
means of acquiring livelihood such as drug trafficking, human labor, and sex trafficking.
According to Jefft, the United States has never established immigration strategies that
successfully grapple with the worldwide forces that drive migration. Strategies to respond to
particular effects of international migration have unswervingly failed to handle realistically with
the blessings and problems of migration.
The formation of the Trafficking and Violence Protection Act in 2000 (TVPA) was a
result of the ineffectiveness and failure of the immigration laws. This law, according to Jefft,
4
intended to give the statutory protection to the individuals under threat of both human and sex
trafficking. However, it has faced cr …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment