Discuss Ethical Issues in the Company’s “Fairness Cream” Advertising. please read my case and analysis the “Ethical issue” And do the ”Fairness cream ” adverting. I NEED 2 PAGES ESSAY. please do not copy the other people or website. you have to finish on you own.
cateora_fair___lovely_case.pdf__1_.docx
cateora_fair___lovely_case.pdf__1_.docx
cateora_fair___lovely_case.pdf.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
CASE 2-2 Cultural Norms, Fair & Lovely,
and Advertising
Fair & Lovely, a branded product of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), is touted as a cosmetic that
lightens skin color. On its website (hul.com.in), the company calls its product “the miracle
worker,” “proven to deliver one to three shades of change.” While tanning is the rage in
Western countries, skin lightening treatments are popular in Asia.
According to industry sources, the top-selling skin lightening cream in India is Fair & Lovely
from Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), followed by CavinKare’s Fairever brand. HUL’s Fair & Lovely
brand dominated the market with a 90 percent share until CavinKare Ltd. (CKL) launched
Fairever. In just two years, the Fairever brand gained an impressive 15 percent market share.
HUL’s share of market for the Fair & Lovely line generates about $60 million annually. The
product sells for about 23 rupees ($0.29) for a 25-gram tube of cream.
The rapid growth of CavinKare’s Fairever (www.cavinkare .com) brand prompted HUL to
increase its advertising effort and to launch a series of ads depicting a “fairer girl gets the boy
theme.” One advertisement featured a financially strapped father lamenting his fate, saying, “If
only I had a son,” while his dark-skinned daughter looks on, helpless and demoralized because
she can’t bear the financial responsibility of her family. Fast-forward and plain Jane has been
transformed into a gorgeous light-skinned woman through the use of a “fairness cream,” Fair &
Lovely. Now clad in a miniskirt, the woman is a successful flight attendant and can take her
father to dine at a five-star hotel. She’s happy and so is her father.
In another ad, two attractive young women are sitting in a bedroom; one has a boyfriend and,
consequently, is happy. The darker-skinned woman, lacking a boyfriend, is not happy. Her
friend’s advice—Use a bar of soap to wash away the dark skin that’s keeping men from flocking
to her.
HUL’s series of ads provoked CavinKare Ltd. to counter with an ad that takes a dig at HUL’s Fair
& Lovely ad. CavinKare’s ad has a father–daughter duo as the protagonists, with the father
shown encouraging the daughter to be an achiever irrespective of her complexion. CavinKare
maintained that the objective of its new commercial is not to take a dig at Fair & Lovely but to
“reinforce Fairever’s positioning.”
Skin color is a powerful theme in India, and much of Asia, where a lighter color represents a
higher status. While Americans and Europeans flock to tanning salons, many across Asia seek
ways to have “fair” complexions. Culturally, fair skin is associated with positive values that
relate to class and beauty. One Indian lady commented that when she was growing up, her
mother forbade her to go outdoors. She was not trying to keep her daughter out of trouble but
was trying to keep her skin from getting dark. Brahmins, the priestly caste at the top of the
social hierarchy, are considered fair because they traditionally stayed inside, poring over books.
The undercaste at the bottom of the ladder are regarded as the darkest people because they
customarily worked in the searing sun. Ancient Hindu scriptures and modern poetry eulogize
women endowed with skin made of white marble. Skin color is closely identified with caste and
is laden with symbolism. Pursue any of the “grooms” and “brides wanted” ads in newspapers or
on the Web that are used by families to arrange suitable alliances, and you will see that most
potential grooms and their families are looking for “fair” brides; some even are progressive
enough to invite responses from women belonging to a different caste. These ads, hundreds of
which appear in India’s daily newspapers, reflect attempts to solicit individuals with the
appropriate religion, caste, regional ancestry, professional and educational qualifications, and,
frequently, skin color. Even in the growing numbers of ads that announce “caste no bar,” the
adjective “fair” regularly precedes professional qualifications. In everyday conversation, the
ultimate compliment on someone’s looks is to say someone is gora (fair). “I have no problem
with people wanting to be lighter,” said a Delhi beauty parlor owner, Saroj Nath. “It doesn’t
make you racist, any more than trying to make yourself look younger makes you ageist.”
Bollywood (India’s Hollywood) glorifies conventions on beauty by always casting a fair-skinned actress
in the role of heroine, surrounded by the darkest extras. Women want to use whiteners because it is
“aspirational, like losing weight.”
Even the gods supposedly lament their dark complexion— Krishna sings plaintively, “Radha kyoon gori,
main kyoon kala? (Why is Radha so fair when I’m dark?).” A skin deficient in melanin (the pigment that
determines the skin’s brown color) is an ancient predilection. More than 3,500 years ago, Charaka, the
famous sage, wrote about herbs that could help make the skin fair.
Indian dermatologists maintain that fairness products cannot truly work as they reach only the upper
layers of the skin and so do not affect melanin production. Nevertheless, for some, Fair & Lovely is a
“miracle worker.” A user gushes that “The last time I went to my parents’ home, I got compliments on
my fair skin from everyone.” For others, there is only disappointment. One 26-year-old working woman
has been a regular user for the past eight years but to no avail. “I should have turned into Snow White
by now but my skin is still the same wheatish color.” As an owner of a public relations firm commented,
“My maid has been using Fair and Lovely for years and I still can’t see her in the dark . . .. But she goes
on using it. Hope springs eternal, I suppose.”
The number of Indians who think lighter skin is more beautiful may be shrinking. Sumit Isralni, a 22year-old hair designer in his father’s salon, thinks things have changed in the last two years, at least in
India’s most cosmopolitan cities, Delhi, Mumbai, and Bangalore. Women now “prefer their own
complexion, their natural way” Isralni says; he prefers a more “Indian beauty” himself: “I won’t judge
my wife on how fair her complexion is.” Sunita Gupta, a beautician in the same salon, is more critical.
“It’s just foolishness!” she exclaimed. The premise of the ads that women could not become airline
attendants if they are dark-skinned was wrong, she said. “Nowadays people like black beauty.” It is a
truism that women, especially in the tropics, desire to be a shade fairer, no matter what their skin color.
Yet, unlike the approach used in India, advertisements elsewhere usually show how to use the product
and how it works.
Commenting on the cultural bias toward fair skin, one critic states, “There are attractive people who go
through life feeling inferior to their fairer sisters. And all because of charming grandmothers and aunts
who do not hesitate to make unflattering comparisons. Kalee Kalooti is an oft-heard comment about
women who happen to have darker skin. They get humiliated and mortified over the color of their skin,
a fact over which they have no control. Are societal values responsible? Or advertising campaigns?
Advertising moguls claim they only reflect prevailing attitudes in India. This is possibly true but what
about ethics in advertising? Is it correct to make advertisements that openly denigrate a majority of
Indian people—the dark-skinned populace? The advertising is blatant in their strategy. Mock anyone
who is not the right color and shoot down their self-image.”
A dermatologist comments, “Fairness obtained with the help of creams is short-lived. The main reason
being, most of these creams contain a certain amount of bleaching agent, which whitens facial hair, and
not the skin, which leads people to believe that the cream worked.” Furthermore, “In India the
popularity of a product depends totally on the success of its advertising.”
HUL launched its television ad campaign to promote Fair & Lovely but withdrew it after four months
amid severe criticism for its portrayal of women. Activists argued that one of the messages the company
sends through its “air hostess” ads demonstrating the preference for a son who would be able to take
on the financial responsibility for his parents is especially harmful in a country such as India where
gender discrimination is rampant. Another offense is perpetuating a culture of discrimination in a
society where “fair” is synonymous with “beautiful.” AIDWA (All India Women’s Democratic
Association) lodged a complaint at the time with HUL about their offensive ads, but Hindustan Unilever
failed to respond.
The women’s association then appealed to the National Human Rights Commission alleging that the ad
demeaned women. AIDWA objected to three things: (1) the ads were racist, (2) they were promoting
son preference, and (3) they were insulting to working women. “The way they portrayed the young
woman who, after using Fair & Lovely, became attractive and therefore lands a job suggested that the
main qualification for a woman to get a job is the way she looks.” The Human Rights Commission passed
AIDWA’s complaints on to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, which said the campaign
violated the Cable and Television Network Act of 1995—provisions in the act state that no
advertisement shall be permitted which “derides any race, caste, color, creed and nationality” and that
“Women must not be portrayed in a manner that emphasized passive, submissive qualities and
encourages them to play a subordinate secondary role in the family and society.” The government
issued notices of the complaints to HUL. After a year-long campaign led by the AIDWA, Hindustan
Unilever Limited discontinued two of its television advertisements for Fair & Lovely fairness cold cream.
Shortly after pulling its ads off the air, HUL launched its Fair & Lovely Foundation, vowing to “encourage
economic empowerment of women across India” by providing resources in education and business to
millions of women “who, though immensely talented and capable, need a guiding hand to help them
take the leap forward,” presumably into a fairer future.
HUL sponsored career fairs in over 20 cities across the country offering counseling in as many as 110
careers. It supported 100 rural scholarships for women students passing their 10th grade, a professional
course for aspiring beauticians, and a three-month Home Healthcare Nursing Assistant course catering
to young women between the ages of 18 and 30 years. According to HUL, the Fair & Lovely Academy for
Home Care Nursing Assistants offers a unique training opportunity for young women who possess no
entry-level skills and therefore are not employable in the new economy job market. The Fair & Lovely
Foundation plans to serve as a catalyst for the economic empowerment for women across India. The
Fair & Lovely Foundation will showcase the achievements of these women not only to honor them but
also to set an example for other women to follow.
AIDWA’s campaign against ads that convey the message, “if she is not fair in color, she won’t get
married or won’t get promoted,” also has resulted in some adjustment to fairness cream ads. In
revised versions of the fairness cream ads, the “get fair to attract a groom” theme is being
reworked with “enhance your self- confidence” so that a potential groom himself begs for
attention. It is an attempt at typifying the modern Indian woman, who has more than just marriage
on her mind. Advertising focus is now on the message that lighter skin enables women to obtain
jobs conventionally held by men. She is career-oriented, has high aspirations, and, at the same
time, wants to look good. AIDWA concedes that the current crop of television ads for fairness
creams are “not as demeaning” as ones in the past. However, it remains against the product; as
the president of AIDWA stated, “It is downright racist to denigrate dark skin.”
Although AIWDA’s campaign against fairness creams seems to have had a modest impact on
changing the advertising message, it has not slowed the demand for fairness creams. Sales of Fair
& Lovely, for example, have been growing 15 to 20 percent year over year, and the $318 million
market for skin care has grown by 42.7 percent in the last three years. Says Euromonitor
International, a research firm: “Half of the skin care market in India is fairness creams and 60 to
65 percent of Indian women use these products daily.” Recently, several Indian companies were
extending their marketing of fairness creams beyond urban and rural markets. CavinKare’s launch
of Fairever, a fairness cream in a small sachet pack priced at Rs 5, aimed at rural markets where
some 320 million Indians reside. Most marketers have found rural markets impossible to penetrate
profitably due to low income levels and inadequate distribution systems, among other problems.
However, HUL is approaching the market through Project Shakti, a rural initiative that targets small
villages with populations of 2,000 people or less. It empowers underprivileged rural women by
providing income-generating opportunities to sell small, lower priced packets of its brands in
villages. Special packaging for the rural market was designed to provide single-use sachet packets
at 50 paise for a sachet of shampoo to Rs 5 for a fairness cream (for a week’s usage). The aim is to
have 100,000 “Shakti Ammas,” as they are called, spread across 500,000 villages in India by year
end. CavinKare is growing at 25 percent in rural areas compared with 15 percent in urban centers.
In addition to expanding market effort into rural markets, an unexpected market arose when a
research study revealed Indian men were applying girlie fairness potions in droves—but on the sly.
It was estimated that 40 percent of boyfriends/husbands of girlfriends/wives were applying white
magic solutions that came in little tubes. Indian companies spotted a business opportunity, and
Fair & Handsome, Menz Active, Fair One Man, and a male bleach called Saka were introduced to
the male market. The sector expanded dramatically when Shah Rukh Khan, a highly acclaimed
Bollywood actor likened to an Indian Tom Cruise, decided to endorse Fair & Handsome.
Euromonitor International forecasts that in the next five years, spending on men’s grooming
Cases 2 The Cultural Environment of Global Marketing
products will rise 24 percent to 14.5 billion rupees, or US$320 million. A recent product review in
www.mouthshut.com, praises Fair & Lovely fairness cream: “[Fair & Lovely] contains fairness
vitamins which penetrate deep down our skin to give us radiant fairness.” “I don’t know if it can
change the skin color from dark to fair, but my personal experience is that it works very well, if you
have a naturally fair color and want to preserve it without much headache.” “I think Riya Sen has
the best skin right now in Bollywood. It appears to be really soft and tender. So, to have a soft and
fair skin like her I recommend Fair & Lovely Fairness Lotion or Cream.” Yet “skin color isn’t a proof
of greatness. Those with wheatish or dark skin are by no way inferior to those who have fair skin.”
Here are a few facts from Hindustan Unilever Ltd.’s homepage: Lever Limited is India’s largest
Packaged Mass Consumption Goods Company. We are leaders in Home and Personal Care
Products and Food and Beverages including such products as Ponds and Pepsodent. We seek to
meet everyday needs of people everywhere—to anticipate the aspirations of our consumers and
customers and to respond creatively and competitively with branded products and services which
raise the quality of life. It is this purpose which inspires us to build brands. Over the past 70 years,
we have introduced about 110 brands.
Fair & Lovely has been specially designed and proven to deliver one to three shades of
change in most people. Also its sunscreen system is specially optimized for Indian skin. Indian
skin, unlike Caucasian skin, tends to “tan” rather than “burn” and, hence, requires a different
combination of UVA and UVB sunscreens.
You may want to visit HUL’s homepage (hul.com.in) for additional information about the
company.
QUESTIONS
1.
Is it ethical to sell a product that is, at best, only mildly effective? Discuss.
2.
3.
Is it ethical to exploit cultural norms and values to promote a product? Discuss.
Is the advertising of Fair & Lovely demeaning to women, or is it promoting the fairness cream in a way
not too dissimilar from how most cosmetics are promoted?
4.
Will HUL’s Fair & Lovely Foundation be enough to counter charges made by AIDWA? Discuss.
5.
In light of AIDWA’s charges, how would you suggest Fair & Lovely promote its product? Discuss. Would
your response be different if Fairever continued to use “fairness” as a theme of its promotion? Discuss.
6.
Propose a promotion/marketing program that will counter all the arguments and charges against Fair
& Lovely and be an effective program.
7.
Now that a male market for fairness cream exists, is the strength of AIDWA’s argument weakened?
8.
Comment on using “Shakti Ammas” to introduce “fairness cream for the masses” in light of AIDWA’s
charges.
9.
Listen to “In India, Skin-Whitening Creams Reflect Old Biases,” NPR, November 12, 2009.
Sources: Nicole Leistikow, “Indian Women Criticize ‘Fair and Lovely’ Ideal,”
Women’s eNews, April 28, 2003; Arundhati Parmar, “Objections to Indian Ad Not Taken Lightly,” Marketing News, June 9, 2003, p. 4; “Fair & Lovely Launches
Foundation to Promote Economic Empowerment of Women,” press release, Fair & Lovely Foundation, hul.com.in (search for foundation), March 11, 2003; Rina
Chandran, “All for Self-Control,” Business Line (The Hindu), April 24, 2003; Khozem Merchant and Edward Luce, “Not So Fair and Lovely,” Financial Times, March
19, 2003; “Fair & Lovely Redefines Fairness with Multivitamin Total Fairness Cream,” press release, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., May 3, 2005; “CavinKare Launches Small
Sachet Packs,” Business India, December 7, 2006; “Analysis of Skin Care Advertising on TV During January–August 2006,” Indiantelevision.com Media, Advertising,
Marketing Watch, October 17, 2006; “Women Power Gets Full Play in CavinKare’s
Brand Strategy.” The Economic Times (New Delhi, India), December 8, 2006; Heather Timmons, “Telling India’s Modern Women They Have Power, Even Over
Their Skin Tone,” The New York Times, May 30, 2007; “The Year We Almost Lost Tall (or Short or Medium-Height), Dark and Handsome,” The Hindustan Times,
December 29, 2007; “India’s Hue and Cry Over Paler Skin,” The Sunday Telegraph (London), July 1, 2007; “Fair and Lovely?” University Wire, June 4, 2007; “The Race
to Keep up with Modern India,” Media, June 29, 2007; Aneel Karnani, “Doing Well by Doing Good—Case Study: ‘Fair & Lovely’ Whitening Cream,” Strategic
Management Journal 28, no. 13 (2007), pp. 1351–57; “In India, Skin-Whitening Creams Reflect Old Biases,” NPR, November 12, 2009.
CASE 2-2 Cultural Norms, Fair & Lovely,
and Advertising
Fair & Lovely, a branded product of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), is touted as a cosmetic that
lightens skin color. On its website (hul.com.in), the company calls its product “the miracle
worker,” “proven to deliver one to three shades of change.” While tanning is the rage in
Western countries, skin lightening treatments are popular in Asia.
According to industry sources, the top-selling skin lightening cream in India is Fair & Lovely
from Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), followed by CavinKare’s Fairever brand. HUL’s Fair & Lovely
brand dominated the market with a 90 percent sha …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Recent Comments