Instructions:In a well-written paper, research and examine individual healthcare rights. Specifically address each of the five rights noted below. Include citation of the law that established this right, a discussion of the legal requirements, and identify a national legal case that tested each of these rights.Right to healthcare (Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act; EMTALA)Right to healthcare finance (Medicare/Medicaid)Right to informed healthcare decisionsRight to personal privacyRight to freedom from wrongful discrimination.Paper Requirements:Your document should:Be well writtenConsist of four to six double-spaced pages, not including the title and reference pagesInclude at least two scholarly references in addition to the course textbook; Health Law & Medical Ethics for Healthcare Professionals, Allen (2013)Follow APA writing format
grading_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

HCM340
Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 2
Meets Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
Requirements
Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points
Content
Demonstrates
strong or adequate
knowledge of the
materials;
correctly
represents
knowledge from
the readings and
sources.
17-20 Points
Critical Analysis
Provides a strong
critical analysis
and interpretation
of the information
given.
9-10 Points
Sources /
Sources or
Examples
examples meet
required criteria
and are well
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Mechanics and Writing
College-level
Proficiency in
Organization,
Grammar, and
Style
9-10 Points
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format, as
outlined in the
assignment; few
errors in grammar
and spelling.
Approaches
Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
16-20 Points
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16-20 Points
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in demonstration
of knowledge.
11-15 Points
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
11-15 Points
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
6-10 Points
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6-10 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials.
13-16 Points
Some significant
but not major
errors or omissions
in analysis and
interpretation.
7-8 Points
Sources or
examples meet
required criteria
but are less than
adequately chosen
to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
9-12 Points
Major errors or
omissions in
analysis and
interpretation.
5-8 Points
Fails to provide
critical analysis and
interpretation of
the information
given.
3-4 Points
Source or example
selection and
integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
7-8 Points
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and in
proper format, as
outlined in the
assignment;
significant number
of errors in
grammar and
5-6 Points
Project is poorly
organized and does
not follow proper
paper format;
numerous errors in
grammar and
spelling.
5-6 Points
Sources or
examples meet
required criteria
and are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
3-4 Points
Project is not well
organized or
written, and is not
in proper paper
format; poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar
and spelling.
HCM340
Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 2
spelling.
9-10 Points
7-8 Points
Proper Use of
Project contains
No more than two
APA Style
proper APA
to three significant
formatting,
errors in APA
according to the
formatting,
CSU-Global Guide
according to the
to Writing and APA CSU-Global Guide
Requirements,
to Writing and APA
with no more than Requirements.
one significant
error.
Total points possible = 100
5-6 Points
Four to five
significant errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements.
3-4 Points
More than five
significant errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global Guide
to Writing and APA
Requirements.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment